Motor Neuroscience Laboratory


Publications

Ebrahimi S, Ostry DJ (2024) The human somatosensory cortex contributes to the encoding of newly learned movements. PNAS 121: e2316294121.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Manning TF (2023) Disruption of somatosensory cortex impairs motor learning and retention. J Neurophysiol 130: 1521-1528.
Abstract | PDF

Franken M, Liu B, Ostry DJ (2022) Towards a somatosensory theory of speech perception. J Neurophysiol 128: 1683-1695.
Abstract | PDF Towards a somatosensory theory of speech perception

Ebrahimi S, Ostry DJ (2022) Persistence of adaptation following visuomotor training. J Neurophysiol 128:1312-1323.
Abstract | PDF

Kumar N, Sidarta A, Smith C, Ostry DJ (2022) Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex contributes to human motor learning. eNeuro
Abstract | PDF

Sidarta A, Komar J, Ostry DJ (2022) Clustering analysis of movement kinematics in reinforcement learning. J Neurophysiol 127:341-353.
Abstract | PDF

Sedda G, Ostry DJ (2021) Self-operated stimuli improve subsequent visual motion integration. J Vision 21:13,1-15.
Abstract | PDF

Ohashi H, Ostry DJ (2021) Neural development of speech sensorimotor learning. J Neurosci 41:4023-4035.
Abstract | PDF

Kumar N, van Vugt FT, Ostry DJ (2021) Recognition memory for human motor learning. Curr Biol 31:1678-1686.
Abstract | PDF

van Vugt FT, Near J, Hennessy T, Doyon J, Ostry DJ (2020) Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: neurochemical signature in primary motor cortex and its relation to functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 122: 1708-1720.
Abstract | PDF

Ito T, Bai J, Ostry DJ (2020) Contribution of sensory memory to speech motor learning. J Neurophysiol 124:1103-1109.
Abstract | PDF

Patri JF, Ostry DJ, Diard J, Schwartz JL, Trudeau-Fisette P, Savariaux C, Perrier P (2020) Speakers are able to categorize vowels based on tongue somatosensation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 117:6255-6263.
Abstract | PDF

Auditory speech perception enables listeners to access phonological categories from speech sounds. During speech production and speech motor learning, speakers' experience matched auditory and somatosensory input. Accordingly, access to phonetic units might also be provided by somatosensory information.The present study assessed whether humans can identify vowels using somatosensory feedback, without auditory feedback.A tongue-positioning task was used in which participants were required to achieve different tongue postures within the /e,?, a/ articulatory range, in a procedure that was totally non-speech like, involving distorted visual feedback of tongue shape.Tongue postures were measured using electromagnetic articulography. At the end of each tongue-positioning trial, subjects were required to whisper the corresponding vocal tract configuration with masked auditory feedback and to identify the vowel associated with the reached tongue posture. Masked auditory feedback ensured that vowel categorization was based on somatosensory feedback rather than auditory feedback. A separate group of subjects was required to auditorily classify the whispered sounds.In addition, we modeled the link between vowel categories and tongue postures in normal speech production with a Bayesian classifier based on the tongue postures recorded from the same speakers for several repetitions of the /e,?, a/ vowels during a separate speech production task. Overall, our results indicate that vowel categorization is possible with somatosensory feed-back alone, with an accuracy that is similar to the accuracy of the auditory perception of whispered sounds, and in congruence with normal speech articulation, as accounted for by the Bayesian classifier.

Darainy M, Vahdat S, Ostry DJ (2019) Neural basis of sensorimotor learning in speech motor adaptation. Cereb Cortex 29:2876-2889.
Abstract | PDF


Motor learning is associated with plasticity in both motor and somatosensory cortex. It is known from animal studies that tetanic stimulation to each of these areas individually induces long-term potentiation in its counterpart. In this context it is possible that changes in motor cortex contribute to somatosensory change and that changes in somatosensory cortex are involved in changes in motor areas of the brain. It is also possible that learning-related plasticity occurs in these areas independently. Tobetter understand the relative contribution to human motor learning ofmotor cortical and somatosensory plasticity, we assessed the time course of changes in primary somatosensory and motor cortex excitability during motor skill learning. Learning was assessed using aforce production task in which a target force profile varied from one trial to the next. The excitability of primary somatosensory cortex was measured using somatosensory evoked potentials in response to median nerve stimulation. The excitability of primary motor cortex was measured using motor evoked potentials elicited by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. These two measures were inter-leaved with blocks of motor learning trials. We found that the earliest changes in cortical excitability during learning occurred in somatosensory cortical responses, and these changes preceded changes inmotor cortical excitability. Changes in somatosensory evoked potentials were correlated with behavioral measures of learning. Changes in motor evoked potentials were not. These findings indicate that plasticity in somatosensory cortex occurs as a part of the earliest stages of motor learning, before changes in motor cortex are observed.NEW & NOTEWORTHY: We tracked somatosensory and motorcortical excitability during motor skill acquisition. Changes in both motor cortical and somatosensory excitability were observed during learning; however, the earliest changes were in somatosensory cortex,not motor cortex. Moreover, the earliest changes in somatosensory cortical excitability predict the extent of subsequent learning; those in motor cortex do not. This is consistent with the idea that plasticity insomatosensory cortex coincides with the earliest stages of human motor learning.
Ohashi H, Valle-Mena R, Gribble P, Ostry DJ (2019) Movements following force-field adaptation are aligned with altered sense of limb position. Exp Brain Res 237:1303-1313.
Abstract | PDF

Previous work has shown that motor learning is associated with changes to both movements and to the somatosensory perception of limb position. In an earlier study that motivates the current work, it appeared that following washout trials, movements did not return to baseline but rather were aligned with associated changes to sensed limb position. Here, we provide a systematic test of this relationship, examining the idea that adaptation-related changes to sensed limb position and to the path of the limb are linked, not only after washout trials but at all stages of the adaptation process. We used a force-field adaptation paradigm followed by washout trials in which subjects performed movements without visual feedback of the limb. Tests of sensed limb position were conducted at each phase of adaptation, specifically before and after baseline movements in a null field, after force-field adaptation, and following washout trials in a null field. As in previous work, sensed limb position changed in association with force-field adaptation. At each stage of adaptation, we observed a correlation between the sensed limb position and associated path of the limb. At a group level, there were differences between the clockwise and counter-clockwise conditions. However, whenever there were changes in sensed limb position, movements following washout did not return to baseline. This suggests that adaptation in sensory and motor systems is not independent processes but rather sensorimotor adaptation is linked to sensory change. Sensory change and limb movement remain in alignment throughout adaptation such that the path of the limb is aligned with the altered sense of limb position.

van Vugt FT, Ostry DJ (2019) Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure. J Neurophysiol 122:1708-1720.
Abstract | PDF

Early stages of sensorimotor map acquisition: learning with free exploration, without active movement or global structure. J Neurophysiol 122: 1708-1720, 2019. First published August 21, 2019; doi:10.1152/jn.00429.2019. One of the puzzles of learning to talk or play a musical instrument is how we learn which movement produces a particular sound: an audiomotor map. The initial stages of map acquisition can be studied by having participants learn arm movements to auditory targets. The key question is what mechanism drives this early learning. Three learning processes from previous literature were tested: map learning may rely on active motor outflow (target), on error correction, and on the correspondence between sensory and motor distances (i.e., that similar movements map to similar sounds). Alternatively, we hypothesized that map learning can proceed without these. Participants made movements that were mapped to sounds in a number of different conditions that each precluded one of the potential learning processes. We tested whether map learning relies on assumptions about topological continuity by exposing participants to a permuted map that did not preserve distances in auditory and motor space. Further groups were tested who passively experienced the targets, kinematic trajectories produced by a robot arm, and auditory feedback as a yoked active participant (hence without active motor outflow). Another group made movements without receiving targets (thus without experiencing errors). In each case we observed substantial learning, therefore none of the three hypothesized processes is required for learning. Instead early map acquisition can occur with free exploration without target error correction, is based on sensory-to-sensory correspondences, and possible even for discontinuous maps. The findings are consistent with the idea that early sensorimotor map formation can involve instance-specific learning. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study tested learning of novel sensorimotor maps in a variety of unusual circumstances, including learning a mapping that was permuted in such as way that it fragmented the sensorimotor workspace into discontinuous parts, thus not preserving sensory and motor topology. Participants could learn this mapping, and they could learn without motor outflow or targets. These results point to a robust learning mechanism building on individual instances, inspired from machine learning literature.


Kumar N, Manning TF, Ostry DJ (2019) Somatosensory cortex participates in the consolidation of human motor memory. PLoS Biol 17:e3000469.
Abstract | PDF

Ohashi H, Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2019) Somatosensory cortical excitability changes precede those in motor cortex during human motor learning. J Neurophysiol 122:1397-1405.
Abstract | PDF

Vahdat S, Darainy M, Thiel A, Ostry DJ (2018) A single session of robot-controlled proprioceptive training modulates functional connectivity of sensory motor networks and improves reaching accuracy in chronic stroke .Neurorehabil Neural Repair 33:70-81.
Abstract | PDF

Sidarta A, van Vugt FT, Ostry DJ (2018) Somatosensory working memory in human reinforcement-based motor learning. J Neurophysiol 120:3275-3286.
Abstract | PDF

Bernardi NF, Van Vugt FT, Valle-Mena R, Vahdat S, Ostry DJ (2018) Error-related persistence of motor activity in resting-state networks. J Cogn Neurosci 20:1-19.
Abstract | PDF

Milner TE, Firouzimehr Z, Babadi S, Ostry DJ (2018) Different adaptation rates to abrupt and gradual changes in environmental dynamics. Exp Brain Res 236:2923-2933.
Abstract | PDF
Adaptation to an abrupt change in the dynamics of the interaction between the arm and the physical environment has been reported as occurring more rapidly but with less retention than adaptation to a gradual change in interaction dynamics. Faster adaptation to an abrupt change in interaction dynamics appears inconsistent with kinematic error sensitivity which has been shown to be greater for small errors than large errors. However, the comparison of adaptation rates was based on incomplete adaptation. Furthermore, the metric which was used as a proxy of the changing internal state, namely the linear regression between the force disturbance and the compensatory force (the adaptation index), does not distinguish between internal state inaccuracy resulting from amplitude or temporal errors. To resolve the apparent inconsistency, we compared the evolution of the internal state during complete adaptation to an abrupt and gradual change in interaction dynamics. We found no difference in the rate at which the adaptation index increased during adaptation to a gradual compared to an abrupt change in interaction dynamics. In addition, we separately examined amplitude and temporal errors using different metrics, and found that amplitude error was reduced more rapidly under the gradual than the abrupt condition, whereas temporal error (quantified by smoothness) was reduced more rapidly under the abrupt condition. We did not find any significant change in phase lag during adaptation under either condition. Our results also demonstrate that even after adaptation is complete, online feedback correction still plays a significant role in the control of reaching.


Van Vugt FT and Ostry DJ (2018) The structure and acquisition of sensorimotor maps. J Cogn Neurosci 30: 290-306.
Abstract | PDF

Sidarta A, Vahdat S, Bernardi NF, Ostry DJ (2016) Somatic and reinforcement-based plasticity in the initial stages of human motor learning. J Neurosci 36:11682-11692.
Abstract | PDF
As one learns to dance or play tennis, the desired somatosensory state is typically unknown. Trial and error is important as motor behavior is shaped by successful and unsuccessful movements. As an experimental model, we designed a task in which human participants make reaching movements to a hidden target and receive positive reinforcement when successful. We identified somatic and reinforcement-based sources of plasticity on the basis of changes in functional connectivity using resting-state fMRI before and after learning. The neuroimaging data revealed reinforcement-related changes in both motor and somatosensory brain areas in which a strengthening of connectivity was related to the amount of positive reinforcement during learning. Areas of prefrontal cortex were similarly altered in relation to reinforcement, with connectivity between sensorimotor areas of putamen and the reward-related ventromedial prefrontal cortex strengthened in relation to the amount of successful feedback received. In other analyses, we assessed connectivity related to changes in movement direction between trials, a type of variability that presumably reflects exploratory strategies during learning. We found that connectivity in a network linking motor and somatosensory cortices increased with trial-to-trial changes in direction. Connectivity varied as well with the change in movement direction following incorrect movements. Here the changes were observed in a somatic memory and decision making network involving ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and second somatosensory cortex. Our results point to the idea that the initial stages of motor learning are not wholly motor but rather involve plasticity in somatic and prefrontal networks related both to reward and exploration.


Ito T, Coppola JH, Ostry DJ (2016) Speech motor learning changes the neural response to both auditory and somatosensory signals. Sci Rep 6:25926
Abstract | PDF
In the present paper, we present evidence for the idea that speech motor learning is accompanied by changes to the neural coding of both auditory and somatosensory stimuli. Participants in our experiments undergo adaptation to altered auditory feedback, an experimental model of speech motor learning which like visuo-motor adaptation in limb movement, requires that participants change their speech movements and associated somatosensory inputs to correct for systematic real-time changes to auditory feedback. We measure the sensory effects of adaptation by examining changes to auditory and somatosensory event-related responses. We find that adaptation results in progressive changes to speech acoustical outputs that serve to correct for the perturbation. We also observe changes in both auditory and somatosensory event-related responses that are correlated with the magnitude of adaptation. These results indicate that sensory change occurs in conjunction with the processes involved in speech motor adaptation.


Ostry DJ, Gribble PL (2016) Sensory plasticity in human motor learning. Trends Neurosci 39:114-123
Abstract | PDF
There is accumulating evidence from behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging studies that the acquisition of motor skills involves both perceptual and motor learning. Perceptual learning alters movements, motor learning, and motor networks of the brain. Motor learning changes perceptual function and the sensory circuits of the brain. Here, we review studies of both human limb movement and speech that indicate that plasticity in sensory and motor systems is reciprocally linked. Taken together, this points to an approach to motor learning in which perceptual learning and sensory plasticity have a fundamental role. Trends Sensorimotor adaptation results in changes to sensory systems and sensory networks in the brain. Perceptual learning modifies sensory systems and directly alters the motor networks of the brain. Perceptual changes associated with sensorimotor adaptation are durable and occur in parallel with motor learning.


Ito T, Ostry DJ, Gracco VL (2015) Somatosensory event-related potentials from orofacial skin stretch stimulation. J Vis Exp e53621-e53621
Abstract | PDF
Cortical processing associated with orofacial somatosensory function in speech has received limited experimental attention due to the difficulty of providing precise and controlled stimulation. This article introduces a technique for recording somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP) that uses a novel mechanical stimulation method involving skin deformation using a robotic device. Controlled deformation of the facial skin is used to modulate kinesthetic inputs through excitation of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. By combining somatosensory stimulation with electroencephalographic recording, somatosensory evoked responses can be successfully measured at the level of the cortex. Somatosensory stimulation can be combined with the stimulation of other sensory modalities to assess multisensory interactions. For speech, orofacial stimulation is combined with speech sound stimulation to assess the contribution of multi-sensory processing including the effects of timing differences. The ability to precisely control orofacial somatosensory stimulation during speech perception and speech production with ERP recording is an important tool that provides new insight into the neural organization and neural representations for speech.


Bernardi NF, Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2015) Somatosensory contribution to the early stages of motor skill learning. J Neurosci 35: 14316 -14326
Abstract | PDF

The early stages of motor skill acquisition are often marked by uncertainty about the sensory and motor goals of the task, as is the case in learning to speak or learning the feel of a good tennis serve. Here we present an experimental model of this early learning process, in which targets are acquired by exploration and reinforcement rather than sensory error. We use this model to investigate the relative contribution of motor and sensory factors to human motor learning. Participants make active reaching movements or matched passive movements to an unseen target using a robot arm. We find that learning through passive movements paired ith reinforcement is comparable with learning associated with active movement, both in terms of magnitude and durability, with improvements due to training still observable at a 1 week retest. Motor learning is also accompanied by changes in somatosensory perceptual acuity. No stable changes in motor performance are observed for participants that train, actively or passively, in the absence of reinforcement, or for participants who are given explicit information about target position in the absence of somatosensory experience. These findings indicate that the somatosensory system dominates learning in the early stages of motor skill acquisition.

Lametti DR, Rochet-Capellan A, Neufeld E, Shiller DM, Ostry DJ (2014) Plasticity in the human speech motor system drives changes in speech perception. J Neurosci 34:10339-10346.
Abstract | PDF

Lametti DR, Krol SA, Shiller DM, Ostry DJ (2014) Brief periods of auditory perceptual training can determine the sensory targets of speech motor learning. Psychol Sci. 25:1325-1336.
Abstract | PDF

Ito T, Johns AR, Ostry DJ (2014) Left lateralized enhancement of orofacial somatosensory processing due to speech sounds. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 56:1875-81.
Abstract | PDF

Vahdat S, Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2014) Structure of plasticity in human sensory and motor networks due to perceptual learning. J Neurosci 34:2451-63.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Vahdat S, Ostry DJ (2013) Perceptual learning in sensorimotor adaptation. J Neurophysiol 110: 2152-2162.
Abstract | PDF

Bernardi NF, Darainy M, Bricolo E, Ostry DJ (2013) Observing motor learning produces somatosensory change. J Neurophysiol 110: 1804-1810.
Abstract | PDF

Ito S, Darainy M, Sasaki M, Ostry DJ (2013) Computational model of motor learning and perceptual change. Biol Cybern 107:653-667.
Abstract | PDF

Nasir SM, Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2013) Sensorimotor adaptation changes the neural coding of somatosensory stimuli. J. Neurophysiol. 109:2077-85.
Abstract | PDF

Mattar AAG, Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2013) Motor learning and its sensory effects: The time course of perceptual change, and its presence with gradual introduction of load. J. Neurophysiol. 109:782-91.
Abstract | PDF

Lametti DR, Nasir S, Ostry DJ (2012) Sensory preference in speech production revealed by simultaneous alteration of auditory and somatosensory feedback. J Neurosci 32:9351-9359.
Abstract | PDF

Rochet-Capellan A, Richer L, Ostry DJ (2012) Non-homogeneous transfer reveals specificity in speech motor learning, J Neurophysiol 107(6):1711-1717.
Abstract | PDF

Mattar AAG, Nasir SM, Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2011) Sensory change following motor learning. in Green AM, Chapman CE, Kalaska JF and Lepore F (Eds), Progress in Brain Research, Volume 191 (pp 29-42).
Abstract | PDF

Vahdat S, Darainy M, Milner TE, Ostry DJ (2011) Functionally specific changes in resting-state sensorimotor networks after motor learning. J Neurosci. 31:16907-16915.
Abstract | PDF

Rochet-Capellan A, Ostry DJ (2011) Simultaneous acquisition of multiple auditory-motor transformations in speech. J Neurosci. 31:2648-2655.
Abstract | PDF

Ito T, Ostry DJ (2010) Somatosensory contribution to motor learning due to facial skin deformation. J Neurophysiol 104:1230-1230.
Abstract | PDF

Lametti DR, Ostry DJ (2010) Postural constraint on movement variability. J Neurophysiol 104:1061-1067.
Abstract | PDF

Mattar AAG, Ostry DJ (2010) Generalization of dynamics learning across changes in movement amplitude. J Neurophysiol 104:426-438.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Darainy M, Mattar AAG, Wong J, Gribble PL (2010) Somatosensory plasticity and motor learning. J Neurosci 30:5384-5393.
Abstract | PDF

Nasir SM, Ostry DJ (2009) Auditory plasticity and speech motor learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:20470-20475.
Abstract | PDF

Laboissiere R, Lametti DR, Ostry DJ (2009) Impedance control and its relation to precision in orofacial movement. J Neurophysiol 102:523-531.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Mattar AAG, Ostry DJ (2009) Effects of human arm impedance on dynamics learning and generalization. J Neurophysiol 101:3158-3168.
Abstract | PDF

Ito T, Tiede M, Ostry DJ (2009) Somatosensory function in speech perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:1245-1248.
Abstract | PDF

Nasir SM, Ostry DJ (2008) Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults. Nat Neurosci 11:1217-1222.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Ostry DJ (2008) Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning. Exp Brain Res 190:153-163.
Abstract | PDF

Andres M, Ostry DJ, Nicol F, Paus T (2008) Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping. Cortex 44:414-419.
Abstract | PDF

Tremblay S, Houle G, Ostry DJ (2008) Specificity of speech motor learning. J Neurosci 28:2426-2434.
Abstract | PDF

The idea that the brain controls movement using a neural representation of limb dynamics has been a dominant hypothesis in motor control research for well over a decade. Speech movements offer an unusual opportunity to test this proposal by means of an examination of transfer of learning between utterances that are to varying degrees matched on kinematics. If speech learning results in a generalizable dynamics representation, then, at the least, learning should transfer when similar movements are embedded in phonetically distinct utterances. We tested this idea using three different pairs of training and transfer utterances that substantially overlap kinematically. We find that, with these stimuli, speech learning is highly contextually sensitive and fails to transfer even to utterances that involve very similar movements. Speech learning appears to be extremely local, and the specificity of learning is incompatible with the idea that speech control involves a generalized dynamics representation.

Darainy M, Towhidkhah F, Ostry DJ (2007) Control of hand impedance under static conditions and during reaching movement. J Neurophysiol 97:2676-2685.
Abstract | PDF

Lametti DR, Houle G, Ostry DJ (2007) Control of movement variability and the regulation of limb impedance. J Neurophysiol 98:3516-3524.
Abstract | PDF

Mattar AAG, Ostry DJ (2007) Neural averaging in motor learning. J Neurophysiol 97:220-228.
Abstract | PDF

Mattar AAG, Ostry DJ (2007) Modifiability of generalization in dynamics learning. J Neurophysiol 98:3321-3329.
Abstract | PDF

Nasir SM, Ostry DJ (2006) Somatosensory precision in speech production. Curr Biol 16:1918-1923.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Malfait N, Towhidkhah F, Ostry DJ (2006) Transfer and durability of acquired patterns of human arm stiffness. Exp Brain Res 170:227-237.
Abstract | PDF

Shiller DM, Houle G, Ostry DJ (2005) Voluntary control of human jaw stiffness. J Neurophysiol 94:2207-2217.
Abstract | PDF

Malfait N, Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2005) Generalization of motor learning based on multiple field exposures and local adaptation. J Neurophysiol 93:3327-3338.
Abstract | PDF

Della-Maggiore V, Malfait N, Ostry DJ, Paus T (2004) Stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex interferes with arm trajectory adjustments during the learning of new dynamics. J Neurosci 24:9971-9976.
Abstract | PDF

Darainy M, Malfait N, Gribble PL, Towhidkhah F, Ostry DJ (2004) Learning to control arm stiffness under static conditions. J Neurophysiol 92:3344-3350.
Abstract | PDF

Malfait N, Ostry DJ (2004) Is interlimb transfer of force-field adaptation a "cognitive" response to the sudden introduction of load? J Neurosci 24:8084-8089.
Abstract | PDF

Petitto LA, Holowka S, Sergio LE, Levy B, Ostry DJ (2004) Baby hands that move to the rhythm of language: hearing babies acquiring sign languages babble silently on the hands. Cognition 93:43-73.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (2003) A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control. Exp Brain Res 221:275-288.
Abstract | PDF

Tremblay S, Shiller DM,Ostry DJ (2003) Somatosensory basis of speech production. Nature 423:866-869.
Abstract | PDF

Malfait N, Shiller DM, Ostry DJ (2002) Transfer of motor learning across arm configurations. J Neurosci 22:9656-9660.
Abstract | PDF

Shiller DM, Laboissiere R, Ostry DJ (2002) The relationship between jaw stiffness and kinematic variability in speech. J Neurophysiol 88:2329-2340.
Abstract | PDF

Shiller DM, Ostry DJ, Gribble PL, Laboissiere R (2001) Compensation for the effects of head acceleration on jaw movement in speech. J Neurosci 21:6447-6456.
Abstract | PDF

Petitto LA, Holowka S, Sergio LE, Ostry DJ (2001) Language rhythms in baby hand movements. Nature 413:35-36.
Abstract | PDF

Suzuki M, Shiller DM, Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2001) Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement. Exp Brain Res 140:171-181.
Abstract | PDF
Patterns of muscle coactivation provide a window into mechanisms of limb stabilization. In the present paper we have examined muscle coactivation in single-joint elbow and single-joint shoulder movements and explored its relationship to movement velocity and amplitude, as well as phasic muscle activation patterns. Movements were produced at several speeds and different amplitudes, and muscle activity and movement kinematics were recorded. Tonic levels of electromyographic (EMG) activity following movement provided a measure of muscle cocontraction. It was found that coactivation following movement increased with maximum joint velocity at each of two amplitudes. Phasic EMG activity in agonist and antagonist muscles showed a similar correlation that was observable even during the first 30 ms of muscle activation. All subjects but one showed statistically significant correlations on a trial-by-trial basis between tonic and phasic activity levels, including the phasic activity measure taken at the initiation of movement. Our findings provide direct evidence that muscle coactivation varies with movement velocity. The data also suggest that cocontraction is linked in a simple manner to phasic muscle activity. The similarity in the patterns of tonic and phasic activation suggests that the nervous system may use a simple strategy to adjust coactivation and presumably limb impedance in association with changes in movement speed. Moreover, since the pattern of tonic activity varies with the first 30 ms of phasic activity, the control of cocontraction may be established prior to movement onset.


Ostry DJ, Romo R (2001) Tactile shape processing. Neuron 31:173-174.
Abstract | PDF

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (2000) Compensation for loads during arm movements using equilibrium-point control. Exp Brain Res 135:474-482.
Abstract | PDF

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1999) Compensation for interaction torques during single- and multijoint limb movements. J Neurophysiol 82:2310-2326.
Abstract | PDF

Shiller DM, Ostry DJ, Gribble PL (1999) Effects of gravitational load on jaw movements in speech. J Neurosci 19:9073-9080.
Abstract | PDF

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1998) Independent coactivation of shoulder and elbow muscles. Exp Brain Res 123:355-360.
Abstract | PDF

Feldman AG, Ostry DJ, Levin MF, Gribble PL, Mitnitski A (1998) Recent tests of the equilibrium point hypothesis. Motor Control 2:189-205.
Abstract | PDF

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ, Sanguineti V, Laboissiere R (1998) Are complex control signals required for human arm movement? J Neurophysiol 79:1409-1424.
Abstract | PDF

Sanguineti V, Laboissiere R, Ostry DJ (1998) A dynamic biomechanical model for neural control of speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1615-1627.
Abstract | PDF

Guiard-Marigny T, Ostry DJ (1997) A system for three-dimensional visualization of human jaw motion in speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:1118-1121.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Vatikiotis-Bateson E, Gribble PL (1997) An examination of the degrees of freedom of human jaw motion in speech and mastication. J Speech Lang Hear Res 40:1341-1351.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Gribble PL, Levin MF, Feldman AG (1997) Phasic and tonic stretch reflexes in muscles with few muscles spindles: human jaw-opener muscles. Exp Brain Res 116:299-308.
Abstract | PDF

Gribble PL, Ostry DJ (1996) Origins of the power law relation between movement velocity and curvature: modeling the effects of muscle mechanics and limb dynamics. J Neurophysiol 76:2853-2860.
Abstract | PDF

Ramsay JO, Munhall KG, Gracco VL, Ostry DJ (1996) Functional data analyses of lip motion. J Acoust Soc Am 99:3718-3727.
Abstract | PDF

Laboissiere R, Ostry DJ, Feldman AG (1996) The control of multi-muscle systems: human jaw and hyoid movements. Biol Cybern 74:373-384.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Gribble PL, Gracco VL (1996) Coarticulation of jaw movements in speech production: is context sensitivity in speech kinematics centrally planned? J Neurosci 16:1570-1579.
Abstract | PDF

Bonda E, Petrides M, Ostry DJ, Evans A (1996) Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. J Neurosci 16:3737-3744.
Abstract | PDF

Perrier P, Ostry DJ, Laboissiere R (1996) The equilibrium point hypothesis and its application to speech motor control. J Speech Hear Res 39:365-377.
Abstract | PDF

Sergio LE, Ostry DJ (1995) Coordination of multiple muscles in two degree of freedom elbow movements. Exp Brain Res 105:123-137.
Abstract | PDF

Bateson EV, Ostry DJ (1995) An analysis of the dimensionality of jaw movement in speech. J Phon 23:101-117.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Munhall KG (1994) Control of jaw orientation and position in mastication and speech. J Neurophysiol 71:1528-1545.
Abstract | PDF

Sergio LE, Ostry DJ (1994) Coordination of mono- and bi- articular muscles in multi-degree of freedom elbow movements. Exp Brain Res 97:551-555.
Abstract | PDF

Parush A, Ostry DJ (1993) Lower pharyngeal wall coarticulation in VCV syllables. J Acoust Soc Am 94:715-22.
Abstract | PDF

Sergio LE, Ostry DJ (1993) Three-dimensional kinematic analysis of frog hindlimb movement in reflex wiping. Exp Brain Res 94:53-64.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Feldman AG, Flanagan JR (1991) Kinematics and control of frog hindlimb movements. J Neurophysiol 65:547-562.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Flanagan JR (1989) Human jaw movement in mastication and speech. Arch Oral Biol 34:685-693.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Cooke JD, Munhall KG (1987) Velocity curves of human arm and speech movements. Exp Brain Res 68:37-46.
Abstract | PDF

Parush A, Ostry DJ (1986) Superior lateral pharyngeal wall movements in speech. J Acoust Soc Am 80:749-756.
Abstract | PDF

Munhall KG, Ostry DJ, Parush A (1985) Characteristics of velocity profiles of speech movements. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:457-474.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Munhall KG (1985) Control of rate and duration of speech movements. J Acoust Soc Am 77:640-648.
Abstract | PDF

Parush A, Ostry DJ, Munhall KG (1983) A kinematic study of lingual coarticulation in VCV sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 74:1115-1125.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ, Keller E, Parush A (1983) Similarities in the control of the speech articulators and the limbs: kinematics of tongue dorsum movement in speech. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 9:622-636.
Abstract | PDF

Keller E, Ostry DJ (1983) Computerized measurement of tongue dorsum movements with pulsed-echo ultrasound. J Acoust Soc Am 73:1309-1315.
Abstract | PDF

Ostry DJ (1983) Determinants of interkey times in typing. In W. E. Cooper (ed.), Cognitive Aspects of Skilled Typewriting, Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
Abstract | PDF
Typewriting, musical instrument playing, spoken language, and dance involve sophisticated motor skills and associated symbol schemes. Researchers in cognition have been interested in these abilities because they enable the study of relations between the structure of motor behavior and the organization of the associated formal system. Typewriting, in particular, is of interest because of the remarkable rate and complexity of finger and hand movements involved and because its performance is readily quantifiable. However, if typewriting is to be used to study either cognitive or motor organization, the factors contributing to its temporal structure must be identified. In this chapter I present the findings of several studies that examine variables that influence the pattern of interkey times in typing. In addition to providing evidence on the constituents of control in typing, the studies provide a basis for the examination of proposals by Ostry (1980) and Sternberg, Monsell, Knoll, and Wright (1978) that certain aspects of typing control are inherently tied to the execution of the sequence. The suggestions arise from observations that patterns of initial latency and interkey time are not changed by the introduction of a delay between stimulus presentation and a response signal. The inability to take advantage of a preparation interval seems to indicate that the programming of typing movements is intimately linked to their execution.